Prediction of Nana Smith vs Linley Tanner Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Smith vs L. Tanner

Nana Smith

JPN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.63m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

274

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$735

Career Money

Right-handed (two-handed forehand and backhand)

Plays

Linley Tanner

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.63m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

274

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$735

Career Money

Right-handed (two-handed forehand and backhand)

Plays

Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 0 Tanner

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nana Smith winning 2 and Linley Tanner winning 0. The last match between Nana Smith and Linley Tanner was at the Indian Wells, 26-02-1990, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Nana Smith getting the victory 7-6 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Smith	1
Tanner	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Indian Wells(02-26-90)

Stats

Nana Smith

Linley Tanner

N. Smith vs L. Tanner H2H Profile

N. Smith	Stats	L. Tanner
$735	Career Prize Money	$0
47.99% (167-181)	Career Total W/L	42.62% (26-35)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Smith vs L. Tanner Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nana Smith has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Linley Tanner has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nana Smith, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Linley Tanner has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nana Smith has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Linley Tanner has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nana Smith has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Linley Tanner winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nana Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 114/113), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/7). Linley Tanner has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 22/26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 2/5).
Player level: In the last year, Nana Smith has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Linley Tanner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nana Smith winning 1 times and Linley Tanner being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nana Smith winning 2 and Linley Tanner winning 0.
The last match between Nana Smith and Linley Tanner was at the Indian Wells, 26-02-1990, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Nana Smith getting the victory 7-6 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nana Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Linley Tanner has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nana Smith has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Linley Tanner has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nana Smith has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Linley Tanner has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nana Smith vs Linley Tanner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Smith vs L. Tanner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Smith	Stats	L. Tanner
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Smith Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Istanbul Cup - Istanbul - 16-05-2005
Q2 Ivana AbramovicI. Abramovic	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Q1 Margit RuutelM. Ruutel	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Fukuoka - 03-05-2004
R1 Aiko NakamuraA. Nakamura	L	0-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Gifu - 26-04-2004
R2 Shiho HisamatsuS. Hisamatsu	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
R1 Monique AdamczakM. Adamczak	W	1-6 6-1 7-6(5)	Stats

View All

L. Tanner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Tampa - 16-04-1990
Q1 Allison CooperA. Cooper	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Amelia Island - 09-04-1990
Q1 Akiko GoodenA. Gooden	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Key Biscayne - 16-03-1990
Q1 Chanda RubinC. Rubin	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Indian Wells - 26-02-1990
Q1 Kilmeny WatermanK. Waterman	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
Q2 Sandy CollinsS. Collins	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Smith vs L. Tanner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Smith	Stats	L. Tanner
47.99% (167/181)	YTD Win/Loss	42.62% (26/35)
48.91% (405/423)	Sets Win/Loss	45.99% (63/74)
49.32% (3715/3818)	Games Win/Loss	48.58% (615/651)
50.22% (114/113)	Hard Win/Loss	45.83% (22/26)
33.33% (6/12)	Clay Win/Loss	28.57% (2/5)
43.24% (16/21)	Indoor Hard W/L	33.33% (2/4)
48.39% (15/16)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
360.97	Average Opponent Rank	439.87
27.78% (10/26)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (3/3)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (1/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
32.26% (10/21)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
62.86% (44/26)	Challenger W/L	43.24% (16/21)
45.71% (16/19)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
48% (167/347)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	43% (26/61)
53% (21/40)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	67% (6/9)
48% (63/132)	Deciding Set Win %	27% (4/15)
76% (170/130)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (30/24)
24% (170/40)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (30/6)
21% (178/38)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	6% (31/2)